Every week we will be including additional questions and informal UPC and UMC interpretations.
1. Is a future gas “stub-out” required to be provided with a shutoff valve and cap? 2. Is a capped outlet without a shutoff valve considered a completed gas system?
1. No. The minimum requirement is a cap. 2. Yes.
Is Teflon tape an approved pipe joint material for gas pipe installations?
Yes, listed Teflon tape is acceptable when carefully and correctly applied to male threads only, since it is insoluble in the presence of fuel gas.
In the UPC, 1. Would a 4' long drain tail piece require support for vertical piping? 2. Would the no-hub coupling installed at the floor drain on the top of the pipe provide support to the piping? 3. Would the no-hub coupling installed at the base of the pipe at the 90 degree fitting provide support?
1) No. A fixture tail piece is limited to 24 inches. If the fitting that connects the tail piece to the fixture is properly supported the tail piece would not need further support. 2) No. You should not rely on no-hub couplings to support the weight. 3) No. No-hub couplings are designed as a means to provide a water tight joint, not to support pipe. The 90 degree fitting must be properly supported.
The UMC appears silent on the length of the guardrail. How long should the guardrail be? I propose it should extend at least 6 feet from any part of the rooftop equipment. What guidance can you give concerning the length of the guardrail?
Although the code is silent on the length of the rail, it would seem reasonable that the guardrail extend the entire length of the equipment as a minimum; although, extending it further would provide additional protection. The Authority Having Jurisdiction should have the final decision on what would be acceptable.
Does the UPC allow a gas line to pass completely under a building from one side to the other if it is sleeved and vented per 1211.1.6 (2009); 1210.1.6 (2012/ 2015)?
Section 1211.1.6 (2009); 1210.1.6 (2012/ 2015) states, “Where the installation of gas piping underground beneath buildings is unavoidable the piping shall be encased in an approved conduit…” The local AHJ shall determine if an alternate route for the gas line exists.
UMC Section 609.0 states that, "Air-moving systems supplying air in excess of 2,000 cubic feet per minute to enclosed spaces within buildings shall be equipped with an automatic shutoff." I have a small service area open to a main display area, (i.e. no enclosing walls) that is conditioned with two heat pumps, each has a separate duct supply and return air. Each heat pump supplies 1,100 cubic feet per minute supply air for a total 2,200 cubic feet per minute to the service area. Are smoke detectors required on each heat pump supply air duct?
Yes, the key to the code section is the definition of air-moving systems. This definition states that an air-moving system comprises one or more air-handling units being used to supply air to a common space or are drawing air from a common space. Therefore, since the units are serving a common space and the aggregate cubic feet per minute exceeds 2000 cubic feet per minute, each unit shall be equipped with smoke detectors as required in Section 609.0. The requirement for automatic shutoff may be omitted if the system meets one of the exceptions.
Does a roof drain overflow require a strainer?
Yes, an overflow drain is still basically a roof drain in the event a primary drain becomes plugged, and therefore, the strainer requirement of Section 1105.2 (2003/2006/2009/2012) 1102.2 (2015) applies. The only time an overflow drain would normally come into use would be due to a blockage of the strainer on the primary drain. This blockage could be caused by accumulation of debris on the roof which could enter the drainage system through an unprotected overflow, rendering the entire storm drainage system inoperative. The strainer requirement would be the same, whether the overflow were installed on either a vertical or a horizontal plane.
Is it mandatory to comply to the present code when chillers are replaced or do the old requirements from the original installation still apply?
Yes, as stated in Section 103.0 (101.3, 2012), "Additions, alterations, repairs and replacement of equipment or systems shall comply with the provisions for new equipment and systems..."
Can cast iron no-hub fittings penetrate a firewall? If so, what fire ratings can they penetrate into? 1 hour, 2 hour, & 4 hour.
Yes, cast iron may penetrate a fire rated wall. Section 1506.2(2003/2006/2009), 1505.2 (2012), 1405.2 (2015) states that, “when penetrating a fire-resistance rated wall, partition, floor, floor-ceiling assembly, roof-ceiling assembly, or shaft enclosure, the fire resistance rating of the assembly shall be restored to its original rating”. Additionally, Section 1506.3 (2003/2006/2009), 1505.3 (2012), 1405.3 (2015) requires that the “… system shall have an F rating of at least 1 hour but not less than the required fire resistance rating of the assembly being penetrated…” In order to determine how to seal a fire rated assembly you would refer to the UL, or any other approved through penetration directory. Look up the type of penetration (floor, wall, concrete, wood, etc.). Then look up the type of material that will be installed through the penetration (in your case, cast iron no hub pipe and fittings). When the correct assembly is located, install it exactly as it is shown in the directory. The directory will identify the hour rating of the assembly. If the directory does not show an approved and listed penetration through a particular assembly with the specific hour ratings (for example a 4 hour assembly) it cannot be penetrated without approval from the AHJ.
1. Where can listed air duct connectors be used in compliance with the UMC? 2. Would an electric water heater be allowed to be installed in a return air plenum?
1. Listed or not, air duct connectors are only approved for use with domestic clothes dryers (reference Section 504.3.2.1, Exception).They may be installed between the domestic clothes dryer and the moisture exhaust duct. 2. Yes, but the electric water heater and wiring must be listed for plenum use.
This question regards the use of a combination waste and vent system installed in a public school (Section 910.0 and Appendix B). This system receives the waste from kitchen sinks which are equipped with waste disposal units. These sinks are located in a home economics classroom. Would this system be acceptable if the disposals were eliminated? I do not believe this type of system is acceptable for receiving the discharge from kitchen sinks or other apparatuses which discharge grease or excessive soap residue.
UPC Section 910.0 permits a combination waste and vent system only if structural conditions preclude the installation of conventional plumbing. Appendix B specifically requires that sinks, lavatories and other fixtures which rough-in above the floor not be permitted to discharge into a combination waste and vent systems. Combination waste and vent systems are intended primarily for extensive floor drain and shower installations where separate venting is not practical, and for floor sinks in markets, demonstration or work tables in school buildings, or similar applications where the fixtures are not adjacent to walls or partitions. Due to the oversized characteristics of this type waste system (which is not self-scouring), grease producing fixtures such as sinks, lavatories, etc., should not be connected to a combination waste and vent system. Discharge of other than clear water waste into an indirect waste receptor would not comply with the intent or provisions of Appendix B, Section 910.0, or Section 304.0.
If you have a code question you would like answered in this forum please click here to submit question
IAPMO members may view the complete online Answers & Analysis content here